In the first amendment, Mr. Chairman, we are dealing with the issue some raised that migrant workers could be hurt, construction workers perhaps, so we are dealing with that issue. In the second there were those who were concerned that if you accrued too many hours and somebody went belly up, you would have all these accrued hours. Of course, we are reducing that, but nevertheless in bankruptcy, of course, wages and benefits are always one of that very top level that you deal with when you start going through the bankruptcy procedure. So I think we have accomplished in both instances what people were concerned about.
William F. Goodling: “In the first amendment, Mr. Chairman, we are dealing with the issue some raised that migrant workers could be hurt…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to the impact on migrant and construction workers during a committee meeting.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.
Right. Secondly, only the partnership gets the money. The church itself cannot get the money. The partnership that the church is working with gets the money, not the church itself.
First of all, the church cannot be a fiscal agent. They cannot, in our legislation, be a fiscal agent.
The Governor Bush model, of course, is the model I have tried to follow for 26 years, and that is to put people before politics but put children before politics. That is what he has done in Texas. That is why we have seen the kind of…





