On the recordMarch 10, 1999
I would repeat one more time that if this amendment had been part of the Goals 2000 legislation, Maryland would not have been eligible to participate.
Source
govinfo.govWilliam F. Goodling: “I would repeat one more time that if this amendment had been part of the Goals 2000 legislation, Maryland would not have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to the Goals 2000 legislation.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
Oct 11, 2000
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.
Oct 11, 2000
New York City would get an extra $190 million if we were fully funding the 40 percent, and Los Angeles would get another $90 million. When we talk about class size reduction, when we talk about school maintenance, think what they could do…
Oct 11, 2000
The Governor Bush model, of course, is the model I have tried to follow for 26 years, and that is to put people before politics but put children before politics. That is what he has done in Texas. That is why we have seen the kind of…
Sep 12, 2000
Right. Secondly, only the partnership gets the money. The church itself cannot get the money. The partnership that the church is working with gets the money, not the church itself.
Other voices in this conversation
