because the amendment deals strictly with title I schools, title I children going from title I schools to another title I school, I rise in support of the amendment by our colleague, the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Boehner]. First of all, it is a local option to implement public school choice, it is entirely up to the local school. Second, the choices are limited to other title I schools. This would avoid the criticism that I would have that you would dilute title I funds and limit the effectiveness of the program if it were going to a non-title I school. Making choices available to parents, particularly in title I programs, encourages them to be more involved in their child's education. The amendment does not require the LEA to provide transportation. So, because of all of those reasons, I rise in support of the gentleman's public school choice amendment.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker supports an amendment related to public school choice for Title I schools.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
for the last 6 years I have been trying to shepherd legislation of this nature through the Congress of the United States so it could actually become law. As the chairman, the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Ford] said, it began with the…
I wanted to make sure Members knew, in the conference statement of the managers, we stated the conferees wish to emphasize the importance of assisting non-English speaking families in becoming literate in English.
I take this time to indicate to all of my colleagues that H.R. 6 is to extend for 5 years the authorization of appropriations for the programs under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. That is the purpose of the Elementary…
I believe Congress needs to protect our domestic interests by ensuring that U.S. manufacturers are insulated from cheap imports.





