I wish to continue the colloquy with the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Fawell). As I was indicating, title I thus establishes a test which does not seek to overrule, does not seek to overrule Town and Country, does not infringe on the legitimate rights of bona fide employees and employee applicants to organize on behalf of unions within the workplace. Indeed the Supreme Court's holding that an individual can be a servant of two masters at the same time is similarly left untouched. Title I simply calls for at least 50 percent to be for the employer. If an applicant cannot show the NLRB's general counsel that he or she sought the job at least half because they really wanted to be an employee, then I believe we would all agree that the employer should not have to hire them.
William F. Goodling: “I wish to continue the colloquy with the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Fawell). As I was indicating, title I thus…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions of a labor-related bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
The Governor Bush model, of course, is the model I have tried to follow for 26 years, and that is to put people before politics but put children before politics. That is what he has done in Texas. That is why we have seen the kind of…
I pleaded with the President, and I said, he can talk about class size reduction, but if he does not have a quality teacher to put in that new classroom, I will guarantee it does not matter whether the teacher-to-pupil ratio is 12 to 1, 20…
Right. Secondly, only the partnership gets the money. The church itself cannot get the money. The partnership that the church is working with gets the money, not the church itself.
New York City would get an extra $190 million if we were fully funding the 40 percent, and Los Angeles would get another $90 million. When we talk about class size reduction, when we talk about school maintenance, think what they could do…





