See, this goes back to the idea that I used to hear, year after year after year. They say, well, we need more money in the program because we are only covering a small number of the children. And I would say what are you covering them with because that is very, very important. So we had a 180 percent increase in Head Start funding which translated into a 39 percent increase in participation. Now, if we have to increase funding 180 percent every time to get a 30 percent increase, there is not enough money in the world to ever get around to full participation. So, you know, it was just the idea: more money, more money, more money. Nobody paid any attention about quality. Just more money.
William F. Goodling: “See, this goes back to the idea that I used to hear, year after year after year. They say, well, we need more money in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the effectiveness of funding increases for the Head Start program.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
New York City would get an extra $190 million if we were fully funding the 40 percent, and Los Angeles would get another $90 million. When we talk about class size reduction, when we talk about school maintenance, think what they could do…
When we were doing that negotiating last year, it was a perfect time. The New York News newspaper had total front page coverage which said, Parents, do you recognize in New York City, 50 percent of your teachers are not qualified? And I…
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.
As a matter of fact, Mr. Speaker, two budgets submitted by the White House in a row had a decrease in funding for special education, 2 years in a row.





