My argument is that we on the Federal level should have nothing to do with certification of teachers whatsoever. It is positively a State responsibility. I tried to explain earlier that you really have to have been a school administrator to understand that there are times when you positively cannot get a certified teacher. I would rather say qualified anyway than certified, because I can get some qualified teachers who may have a master's degree, but they do not have pedagogical training. If you have a resignation 2 weeks before school begins, you positively have to get the best possible person you can get into that classroom. You cannot steal a certified teacher some other place. You have to get the best person and that person may not have all of the necessary education credits in order to be properly certified by that State.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the federal role in teacher certification and emphasizes state responsibility.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
There is no question it kills the bill. Title VII at the present time exempts churches and religious organizations from employment discrimination laws. So, obviously, the church is not going to give up that title VII exemption or the…
I commend our country's music teachers for their efforts and for the role they play in the lives of our children, and I urge my colleagues to join me by supporting this legislation and vote yes on final passage.
Well, I latched on to GW; he did not latch on to me. And I latched on to him primarily because of his ability to lead a Democrat house and a Democrat senate in the State of Texas to bring about the best education reform probably anywhere…
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.





