This is not legislation that takes a step backward, as some people mention. As a matter of fact, it is an attempt to move into the 21st century. As I indicated before, unless we can get labor and management to move into the 21st century, there is very little hope for us to be competitive with the rest of the world. It is time we understand it is the 21st century, not the 1930s when the labor laws were written, not the 1930s when we talked about men only in the workforce, when we talked about only a manufacturing economy. It is the 21st century. Someone over there said, 'Why would you seek employment to harm the company? No one would ever do anything like that.' Mr. Chairman, that is what this legislation is about, because that is exactly what is happening.
William F. Goodling: “This is not legislation that takes a step backward, as some people mention. As a matter of fact, it is an attempt to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing labor laws and their relevance in the context of modern workforce dynamics.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
First of all, the church cannot be a fiscal agent. They cannot, in our legislation, be a fiscal agent.
When we were negotiating the 100,000 teachers last year, the first thing the administration said is we have to take about 10 percent off the top, I think they wanted 15 percent, to keep on the Federal level. I said, wait a minute, you are…
When we were doing that negotiating last year, it was a perfect time. The New York News newspaper had total front page coverage which said, Parents, do you recognize in New York City, 50 percent of your teachers are not qualified? And I…
Over 25 years, $90 million a year for 25 years, that sounds like big money to me.





