75 percent of the American people support the line-item veto, and have supported the line-item veto for a long time. It has been suggested that there are a number of reasons why we should not enact this legislation. It has been suggested that it is unconstitutional. It is not really our job to determine what is constitutional or what is not unconstitutional, but the fact is that we do provide severability in this measure. If a provision, any provision of the matter is considered to be unconstitutional, it can be stricken and the rest of the matter can stand. It has also been suggested... that we have engaged in a reckless transfer of power. I would suggest, on the contrary, this provides the President with a refined tool to attack the deficit problem that looms over us. It merely gives him an effort to be more selective in the way that he goes about deficit reduction. Congress retains the power to override any Presidential veto. We have not given that power away.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the line-item veto and its implications during a House floor debate.
Share
More from William Clinger
I want to announce to the Members of the House that the White House has, within the last half hour, turned over a box of documents to my committee, the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, regarding our investigation into the…
It strikes me there are analogies here to the Great Lakes initiative where we have had some indication what the cost might be, but the costs became wildly beyond anybody's wildest dreams what it might actually involve. At any rate, Mr…
as I stated the day the Government Reform and Oversight Committee favorably reported this bill, I believe the district of Columbia will today move one step closer to self-sufficiency, to financial independence, perhaps even to true home…
There is no bar to anybody who is, as my colleague knows, anyone can get in and bid on these Government procurements.





