The concept of the lockbox is very simple. It makes basic common sense. In essence it provides that amendments to cut spending actually produce savings. I think I was as dismayed as many people to realize that when we often go through agony to get savings, those savings are not real; they in fact are then used for other purposes. Most taxpayers would agree and believe that when Congress agrees to eliminate $5 billion for the space station or $7 billion for the super collider, that the money remains in the Treasury. But in fact under existing law or current law those tax dollars go back into the pot and can be reallocated or spent later in the same year. So I think everyone would have to agree that is an odd process at any time, and the practice frankly is just absolutely insupportable in an era of $200 billion deficits and $5 trillion national debt.
Editor's note · Context
Speaking in support of a bill aimed at ensuring that spending cuts result in actual savings.
Share
More from William Clinger
Absolutely, and that is one of the changes that has been made, frankly, since we last considered this measure, the DOD authorization bill. There was a concern that we were eliminating the language which has been relied on so long and…
Mr. Speaker, on February 6 of this year the House passed H.R. 2, to give the President the line-item veto. The Senate followed suit in adopting S. 4, a separate enrollment version of item veto which was both considerably weaker than the…
I think we have had a very thorough debate. We are ready to vote on this matter. It is clear, there is a significant difference between us on this major issue. I would point out one thing: The gentlewoman from Illinois said not one word…
I want to commend him and the gentleman from California [Mr. Dellums] and all of the members of the Committee on National Security for giving us this opportunity to revisit this very, very important bill, the Defense authorization matter…





