I think that for the first time we are really going to have some consideration for what are the compliance costs, what does it cost to carry out the number of the mandates that we have had in the past, but I think that the environmental community, which has never shown too much concern or interest in, frankly, what the costs that we have imposed on the communities would be, I think would still rather straitjacket small communities insisting that they adhere to a national prescribed program specifically detailing in detail precisely how each community must meet the requirements without with regard to the financial consequences borne by the rate of players, and for that reason I would again oppose the amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing compliance costs and environmental mandates during a legislative debate.
Share
More from William Clinger
Let me say I commend the gentleman for the contribution he made to this bill because he did, took a great interest and had a very helpful contribution. We were unfortunately unable to sustain all of his amendments in the conference report…
Mr. Chairman, this bill, the Federal Acquisition Reform Act of 1995, is an important piece of legislation, which the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Spence], chairman of the Committee on National Security, and I introduced along with…
I want to commend him and the gentleman from California [Mr. Dellums] and all of the members of the Committee on National Security for giving us this opportunity to revisit this very, very important bill, the Defense authorization matter…
I would indicate that I think a ``yes'' vote on this matter would in effect be saying that we would allow an unfunded mandate to be passed through, or open the door to passing through, an unfunded mandate to the States. Those who would…





