We have had a thorough debate on two of the proposed exemptions, both of which were rejected by substantial votes. So I think we have made it pretty clear we do not intend to accept these. Hopefully some of these would be withdrawn or not offered so we can move on to consider some of the other very important issues that need to be debated.
William Clinger: “We have had a thorough debate on two of the proposed exemptions, both of which were rejected by substantial votes. So I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the rejection of proposed exemptions during a legislative debate.
Share
More from William Clinger
The gentlewoman makes a very, very strong point. This is one way that we can help preserve the industrial base. If we see that shrink dramatically, it would, in fact, jeopardize us in the event we have hostilities somewhere else in the…
But it does not have to be Defense Department. Mandatory spending is all across the board.
In fact, the offsets can come, when this happens, if the President decides to waive it now, he, under this bill, would be required to provide the offset. We could make it very clear that they were not to be taken out of military spending…
I rise in fervent support of S. 1124, the Department of Defense authorization conference report. I want to commend the chairman... The provisions that are in this bill are consistent with H.R. 1670, the Federal Acquisition Reform Act of…





