the purpose, I want to reemphasize, is to make it very clear that it was our intent that the President not be able to look beyond statutory or report language. That is the absolute limit as to what he is able to look at or impact. There had been some suggestions that this was kind of an open sesame, that we were going to allow the President sort of to roam through all kinds of extraneous documents and extraneous material to affect the report. We are going to make it very clear that this is a severely limited power and that it is limited to appropriations bills, statutory bills, and committee reports.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations on presidential power regarding appropriations and report language.
Share
More from William Clinger
I would just question the appropriateness of the inspector general making policy in these kinds of areas. It seems to me it is the policymakers of the Department of Defense who really should be paid attention to in this area.
But it does not have to be Defense Department. Mandatory spending is all across the board.
Just to briefly say, Mr. Speaker, the President has agreed to the date. Obviously he is confident that he is in fact going to be reelected. I do not share that confidence, but he believes that he will be. Therefore, he is going to have…
75 percent of the American people support the line-item veto, and have supported the line-item veto for a long time. It has been suggested that there are a number of reasons why we should not enact this legislation. It has been suggested…





