First of all, Mr. Chairman, we are not talking about a new nuclear weapon. That is not the discussion here. We are talking about an attempt to repackage an existing nuclear weapon for a new threat that we have to deal with. We know the Russians have 13,000 tactical nuclear weapons. If you really want to stop proliferation, I would like to see my colleague from Massachusetts offer an amendment to negotiate for a serious reduction of tactical nuclear weapons. These tactical nuclear weapons are a real threat to us. The Russians have 13,000 of them.
W. Weldon: “First of all, Mr. Chairman, we are not talking about a new nuclear weapon. That is not the discussion here. We are…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the issue of tactical nuclear weapons and proliferation.
Share
More from W. Weldon
I would just remind my good friend that it was not his committee that created the fire grant program. It was this gentleman who brokered the fire grant program as an addition to the defense authorization bill. It was not the gentleman, it…
I did not say that this was added in last night. I said this was not in the Senate bill. That is what I said. And that has, in fact, been said by both sides. I was told that this bill was identical to what the Senate passed and that is in…
I can tell you what I am going to do, I will vote in favor of it and I encourage other people who have been supportive of Shays-Meehan to do the same thing because this is not what we were led to believe. I am voting ``yes.''
The point is the gentlewoman has tried to also find the middle ground. And I think not to allow this research by taking the money away is a mistake because, in fact, the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy has announced publicly they are…





