I did not say that this was added in last night. I said this was not in the Senate bill. That is what I said. And that has, in fact, been said by both sides. I was told that this bill was identical to what the Senate passed and that is in fact not the case. So I have been misled. But I do not like the fact that the gentleman misrepresented what I said. I urge my colleagues who voted for Shays-Meehan to support this amendment because this was stuck in because obviously someone sees a financial advantage that the Senate did not see. It is wrong and it is not in the spirit of what campaign finance reform is all about.
W. Weldon: “I did not say that this was added in last night. I said this was not in the Senate bill. That is what I said. And that…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing mischaracterizations regarding campaign finance reform during a debate.
Share
More from W. Weldon
I would just remind my good friend that it was not his committee that created the fire grant program. It was this gentleman who brokered the fire grant program as an addition to the defense authorization bill. It was not the gentleman, it…
I can tell you what I am going to do, I will vote in favor of it and I encourage other people who have been supportive of Shays-Meehan to do the same thing because this is not what we were led to believe. I am voting ``yes.''
The point is the gentlewoman has tried to also find the middle ground. And I think not to allow this research by taking the money away is a mistake because, in fact, the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy has announced publicly they are…
This amendment is critically important, Mr. Chairman, because it requires the Federal Government to establish what should have been established years ago, and that is a process of identifying emergency preparedness compacts. Many of our…





