the adoption of this amendment would help to ensure sufficient competition among the designers and manufacturers of water and wastewater treatment equipment across the country. It is premised on the idea that small firms ought to have the same chance at bidding on a project as large firms. In addition, with there being a critical need to upgrade our water and sewer infrastructure, requiring States to ensure a full and open competition would likely reduce the cost of the program and help finance additional and much needed projects. This amendment would simply provide that, 'No specification for bids shall be written in such a manner as to contain proprietary, exclusionary or discriminatory requirements other than those based upon performance, unless such requirements are necessary to test or demonstrate a specific thing or to provide for necessary interchangeability of parts and equipment.'
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to promote competition in water and wastewater treatment equipment procurement.
Share
More from Todd Russell Platts
I thank the gentleman for yielding. As cochair of the Traumatic Brain Injury Task Force, I am honored to join with the gentleman from New Jersey in support of implementing post-acute treatment guidelines. Before 2007, there were no funds…
My concern is that the president's budget proposal is trying to reinvent the wheel at the expense of proven and critically needed Perkins programs.
I am the lead Republican with Mr. Donnelly on the America Works Act, which is to then promote the--what has been discussed here to some degree already--the nationally recognized, very portable skill credentials.
We should perform the best we can today while embracing change so we can perform even better in the future.





