recently the idea of privatizing the United States air traffic control system has been given a renewed life. Mr. Speaker, that would be a very bad idea. A competent and reliable air traffic control system is vital to the safety of our flying public, and public safety is a responsibility of the Government. Simply put, air traffic controllers perform an inherently governmental function for our Nation. Mr. Speaker, proponents of privatizing air traffic controllers like to cite three countries they consider to be successful examples of privatization: Australia, Great Britain, and Canada. Unless we consider a walkout, a pending bankruptcy and a pending labor strike to be examples of success, I would respectfully disagree. Let us face the fact that privatization of air traffic control does not work. On September 11 of last year, air traffic controllers proved their worth as inherently governmental employees. Our air traffic control system is the envy of the world. Let us keep it that way.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the privatization of the U.S. air traffic control system.
Share
More from TIM HOLDEN
Madam Speaker, S. 1206, the Appalachian Regional Development Act Amendments of 2002, authorizes appropriations for the Appalachian Regional Commission for 5 years. The commission works to ensure the people and businesses of the Appalachian…
I have serious concerns about the TMDL--both in terms of process and the likely impacts on our farms and communities.
To break our nation's dependence on foreign oil, it is important to develop a diverse portfolio of energy alternatives including renewable, home-grown biofuels.
Madam Speaker, it appears that my friend from Michigan's motion is to instruct the House to recede to the Senate's definition of renewable biomass. The House conferees have receded to the Senate on their definition of renewable biomass…





