I will then offer an amendment to the rule that will instruct the Enrolling Clerk to add to the conference report language to permanently extend Chapter 12 bankruptcy protections for family farmers. This is not a proposal that should be considered controversial. In fact, this House has voted overwhelmingly three times in the last 18 months to extend these bankruptcy protections for family farmers. Chapter 12 was enacted in 1986 as a temporary measure to allow family farmers to repay their debts according to a plan under court supervision. It prevents a situation from occurring where a few bad crop years lead to the loss of the family farm. In the absence of Chapter 12, farmers are forced to file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code's other alternatives, none of which work quite as well for farmers as Chapter 12. Chapter 11, for example, will require a farmer to sell the family farm to pay the claims of creditors. How can a farmer be expected to come up with the money to pay off his debts without his farm? Chapter 11 is an expensive process that does not accommodate the special needs of farmers. Since its creation, Chapter 12, family farmer bankruptcy protection, has been renewed regularly by Congress and has never been controversial.
On the recordSeptember 26, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the need to extend Chapter 12 bankruptcy protections for family farmers.
Share
More from TIM HOLDEN
May 20, 2009
What is really troubling to me is I represent the anthracite coal fields of Pennsylvania...
Jan 21, 2009
Our infrastructure has just been completely disinvested and we need to step up those investments.
Jun 10, 2009
The definition of renewable biomass contained in the renewable fuel standard of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 is problematic because it could exclude a majority of the country's biomass.
Oct 9, 2002
Mr. Speaker, I rise to offer my support for the resolution before us and to offer my support for our President. There is no task that any of us faces that is more serious than making the decision to commit our military to danger abroad…





