Scott Perry

What the American public got was not the straight stuff but the false reporting. Its influence was enormous and long-lasting.

This is nothing new.

I think it is important for the record to give some people a sense of history they might not know

It seems to me it would be inappropriate to swear in the Inspector General in this case.

I can't tell you exactly what it would take to reach that.

Does it appear that there was criminal activity here at all to you?

I think it would be important for us to know if there is undue pressure being placed on individuals within the administration.

I guess, finally--so you are telling us it is a coincidence that former DNC Chairman and PA Governor Ed Rendell was a paid consultant representing L.A. Films...

I guarantee you that my troops knew what the mission was and knew who the enemy was.

I just wrote down FAA, DOD, DOE, Justice. There is no limit, probably, to the number of agencies that might or should be involved in a comprehensive strategy.

There are a lot of things to be concerned about.

Threats posed by small UAS are nothing new.

Several recent security incidents are concerning.

The proposed rules would place numerous limitations on flying small UAS: Flights could take place only in daylight, the area of operations would be limited, and only visual-line-of-sight operations would be permitted.

When most people think of unmanned aerial systems (UAS), commonly known as 'drones', they think of large aircraft used in overseas combat operations.

But you must understand the American people demand accountability, and while the work goes on there is not one single person at the top that can really be focused upon for the failings.

If it has an impact on your funding, on the funding of USAID--what the Palestinian Authority and Hamas does in the International Criminal Court, understanding Hamas is recognized terrorist organization, if they pursue war crimes against…

I want to make sure that all of the money is going to those programs and none of it is going to tunnel construction by Hamas.

It just shows to me a lack of commitment to the oversight of a lot of money and in the face of large request it seems antithetical.

At the end of my time here. We hear that sending defensive weapons will escalate the problem. Not sending them that won't escalate the problem; there won't be a problem because there will be no more Ukraine.

You must defend yourself.

The Ukrainians have been patient because they have no choice.

I too agree that we should send defensive weapons to Ukraine.

I am just wondering, to start out, does the administration agree--because we have heard in other forums about grievances, legitimate grievances.

DHS must secure the homeland efficiently and effectively.