I must say, Ms. Norton, it looks like we have agreement that welfare has done harm, more harm than good, listening to the opponents to the proposition. Maybe we ought to get down into the details. I do not know where you all get your figures, but they are really fun to listen to, but inaccurate. I have got several charts here that I would like to explain to you. These charts are given to us by the Congressional Budget Office and the Congressional Research Service run by the Democrat majority that controls this House. It shows that welfare spending from 1950 to 1992 has increased significantly, gone out of sight; yet at the same time, AFDC enrollment has gone out of sight, the illegitimacy rate has gone out of sight, the poverty rate has gone out of sight.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of welfare programs during a House debate.
Share
More from Robert Walker
I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. In the explanation just given by the gentlewoman from Hawaii, you have heard precisely, precisely the difference between the two budgets you have before you today. The gentlewoman from…
I think that raises an interesting point, because what the gentleman is now suggesting is exactly what I said before, that we are engaging in wish-list politics out here, because he cites the $100 million and then suggests that in this one…
Mr. Chairman, this has been a very emotional debate. I am sorry for some of what has been said, because a few minutes ago, as I was watching the debate, I heard one of our colleagues come to the floor and utter some despicable racial slurs…
the fact is the Department of Agriculture and NIH opted out of the licensing procedure at NTIS. The technologies available are still at NTIS. You can still find out what the technologies are that can be transferred to you through NTIS…





