I think that raises an interesting point, because what the gentleman is now suggesting is exactly what I said before, that we are engaging in wish-list politics out here, because he cites the $100 million and then suggests that in this one bill for this one agency that $50 million of that money ought to be usurped. The fact is that bill covers NASA. It covers the energy projects at the Department of Energy. It covers a very vast budget well beyond the National Science Foundation, and in one fell swoop it is suggested we should come out here and simply usurp $50 million for a budget bill that has yet to pass either House. We know the budget bill on which the gentleman from New York is relying has passed this House. The budget conference report has yet to pass either House. Even if it passes, the fact is there is only $100 million there to work with, of which the gentleman wants to take 50.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget allocations and the implications of proposed funding changes.
Share
More from Robert Walker
one of the things that really does get in the way of economic development in this country is the myriad of regulations that have been written at the Federal, State, and local level which take the power out of the hands of entrepreneurs to…
The point is that here we have this Tetracofico that includes these four items, including the giant money bag that we know from the original bill was a $12 billion item. It is not here, but guess what is coming, folks. Guess what is just…
What about welfare reform? Surely that is in the budget. The President has talked so much about welfare reform.
So if I understand this, we have lower deficits than the President. We have more in the way of reform than the President's budget, and we do not raise taxes at all.





