let me say I come to this Congress as a strong supporter of the restriction on unfunded mandates, and I come to this Congress as a former finance officer. I am strongly opposed to this point of order because I think it stretches that rule beyond recognition. That rule was never intended to freeze in perpetuity our current minimum wage. If we sustain this point of order, I think it will open the door to many more unfunded mandates.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a point of order related to unfunded mandates and minimum wage during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Philip English
when the Democrats took control of this body, prices at the pump were about 30 percent lower. The price on the spot market for a barrel of oil was $55, not $100 the way it was last week. They promised to address the energy crisis that has…
I rise, sadly, to oppose this unconscionable power grab in which the Democrats, who claimed they have changed, have clearly indicated that they are back. They are up to the old tricks that they tried 12 years ago when they were thrown out…
tonight we rise at a time when people all over the world are watching the Middle East, are watching the bombs that have lit up both Israel and Lebanon, are watching the troop movements and are hoping earnestly for peace. {time} 2015…
And what is particularly perverse about it, to respond to the gentleman, is we are talking here about permanent tax increases, to provide temporary protection to other taxpayers. Ultimately they have created a series of PAYGO rules that…





