We need help to combat this problem.

It is my sincere belief that SIPC's misguided administration of SIPA and the Circuit Courts of Appeals' decisions affirming SIPC's actions pose a very real threat to U.S. investors.

On behalf of the Pennsylvania State Coroners Association, we are writing this letter in support of S. 1913.

Most importantly, I do not see a more effective, credible or realistic alternative that would give the United States a greater probability at this point of preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon.

I do not think that is right.

I think it is clear that is meant to be completely all-encompassing, and yet we discover that there is a secret side agreement between the IAEA and Iran.

I am concerned that this dynamic creates a very--this fact creates a very dangerous dynamic, one in which the Administration will have a very hard time enforcing anything other than a massive violation.

While this 'No Deal' scenario could play out in many, different ways, I think it is probable that it would leave the United States weaker, rather than stronger, in confronting Iran's nuclear program.

If I thought it was realistic to renegotiate the agreement to make it stronger, I would support that option.

The Iran Nuclear Review Act of 2015 is abundantly clear, I think, that Congress is supposed to receive all the documentation.

We are being asked to vote to affirm an agreement that seems to me the enforcement of which depends in no small part on a very important document that not only are we not allowed to see.

I think that was a compromise that should not have been made.