Colleagues, Congress is, after all, the first branch of government, and we have explicit constitutional responsibilities, and they include trade.

We need to weigh these costs against the perceived potential benefits of a shift, and we should do so in an open, transparent, and accountable way.

I hope that there is a universal acknowledgment that there has never been--and certainly in the tax reform we did--any pernicious racial intent in the sense of trying to benefit a given group at the expense of another.

We should be rolling back the harmful Biden administration policies that are threatening the U.S. energy renaissance.

You know, I think what we are going to hear today are two competing visions for how we help rural America.

If we unwind the pro-growth features in our tax reform, we are not going to get back to those days.

The truth of this whole situation that we have got to weigh and think about is the reason this has happened is because more efficient farming systems and approaches and companies deliver lower-cost food for consumers.

You know, Wyoming is very blessed in that we have an abundance of natural resources, including robust minerals.

The idea behind the tax reform...was to lower the after-tax costs of deploying capital...to help improve productivity.

When our Government leaders start attacking our economy directly, that is where we have significant concerns.

Lifting the cap on the SALT tax would do... a big subsidy from working Americans to the richest Americans.

I think it is very, very important to underscore that it was almost immediately after we passed the tax reform that we had the best economy of my lifetime.