Mr. Chairman, I wish that the authors of amendments who get up to say they are against Shays-Meehan would find another vehicle to drag down debate. We have been debating this bill for quite some time now, and the author of the amendment says that she is against it, but here is an amendment anyways. This could be an amendment that we could all agree upon. I would ask the gentlewoman if somebody is working on a get-out-the-vote effort and wants to buy coffee for people at a polling station, and, let us say, the coffee stand will not accept a check, how does one get around those types of expenditures, small disbursements like that? The gentlewoman may know that under the FEC law now, there are certain amounts of money, under $200, that are made available. It is required under the FEC that receipts get kept, and clearly they should be kept. But what does one do about that election day activity, with voter apathy and voter turnout going down dramatically, about these type of efforts to get people out to vote? Could the gentlewoman's amendment in some way accommodate these types of efforts?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of campaign finance laws on voter turnout efforts.
Share
More from Pat Meehan
A grateful Nation thanks you for the sacrifice of your children, the service of your children, and the sacrifice of your families.
This idea that somehow there is this Republican effort to just drop the thing and leave everybody on the street, instead of the real genuine effort which is to take something that isn't working and try to get it to work better.
These are things that just do not make sense dollar wise. As you said, they save lives for those who have put their lives on the line for us.
I appreciate the opportunity to testify about the importance of providing funding to continue to address the problems of opioid and heroin addiction.





