Mr. Chairman, we enact campaign finance reform once in a generation. The last time we enacted meaningful, comprehensive campaign finance reform was in the post-Watergate era. For a while that system worked pretty well. But over a period of the last 20 to 25 years, loopholes have developed in the law, loopholes being that incredible amounts of soft money, over and above the legal limits, are being spent to influence elections in our country. An incredible amount, millions of dollars in sham issue ads are being spent to influence elections in our country. So we now have a unique opportunity to pass comprehensive campaign finance reform. We have to make sure that when we pass this bill, we do not pass a bill that already has loopholes in it. The Hutchinson amendment fails to close the soft money loophole because it enables the insurance companies and the tobacco companies and all of these special interests to circumvent the Federal parties and influence Federal campaigns by going to the States. Many of these States do not even have disclosure requirements of this money. It is too big of a loophole. It does not do anything about reining in sham issue ads. It is too big of a loophole. We have to deal with both of these problems. That is why we have to pass this bill. Finally, a majority of the Members of the Senate have supported this legislation.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for campaign finance reform during a debate on related legislation.
Share
More from Pat Meehan
These are going to create jobs, they are going to enhance the promotion of alternative energy and, most importantly, they are going to also help us promote better investment and health outcomes.
These are things that just do not make sense dollar wise. As you said, they save lives for those who have put their lives on the line for us.
This idea that somehow there is this Republican effort to just drop the thing and leave everybody on the street, instead of the real genuine effort which is to take something that isn't working and try to get it to work better.
A game like this can symbolize the fact that, you know, we all disagree on a lot of things, but we can work together.





