Look, there is no need for a definition of what negligence is in this amendment because negligence has been established in case law all across this country in all 50 States. All 50 States have case law that determine what the standard of negligence is. This particular underlying bill tends to undermine the States' ability for people to go into court and be made whole that are victims of negligence under those individual State laws. Now, it may well be great in Boston that they decided not to follow through with a suit because it was frivolous. And I believe that to the extent that frivolous suits are dismissed, even against the gun companies, that is a fine thing and that is the way it should work. But let me give an example of why my amendment is necessary. Let us take for example the case of Ken McGuire and David Lemongello, two New Jersey police officers who were shot in the line of duty and at this moment in time are seriously injured. These officers have filed a civil action against a West Virginia pawnshop that had a clerk sell 12 guns in one cash transaction to a suspicious straw purchaser.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of negligence law in relation to a specific case involving police officers and gun sales.
Share
More from Pat Meehan
The Department of Homeland Security plays a crucial role in preventing cyber attacks on our Governmental and critical infrastructure key resources.
These are going to create jobs, they are going to enhance the promotion of alternative energy and, most importantly, they are going to also help us promote better investment and health outcomes.
What is being done to look at the cases for those 618? Because in the same case, justice delayed is justice denied.
I hope every college kid who is sitting here with their visions of the important world they are playing with social activism... will appreciate that when they are sitting in their dorm smoking dope purchased from these drug gangs.





