Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. For more than 50 years, the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission has worked to fulfill its statutory mission to protect the public against unreasonable risk of injuries and deaths associated with consumer products. By cutting the CPSC's budget by half, this amendment would gut the agency's staff and undermine its mission. It is an extreme measure that would place children, families, and communities around the country at greater risk of injury and death from product hazards. This amendment would leave consumers vulnerable to products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard or that can injure children. Mr. Chair, I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote. Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Matt Cartwright
Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Montana will be postponed. Amendment No. 92 Offered by Mr. Rosendale The Acting…
Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for the time, and I rise in support of this bill. The Commerce-Justice-Science division of this bill preserves solid funding for an array of important public investments. For example, the Manufacturing…
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment which would hinder efforts to promote transparency and accountability in small business lending and create hurdles for lenders and community organizations working to help women-owned…
Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Connolly).





