So, you know, I think it takes us back to basics again, and the basics being, if it looks like a duck and it swims like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck.

There is no exception in the Constitution that allows a President to cheat in an election just because the economy's going well.

He remains an ongoing threat to both.

We are not judging the President himself; we are judging his actions.

There is plenty of direct evidence of the President's wrongdoing.

I think we are just trying to work through it as expeditiously as we can.

Impeachment is not about undoing an election. Elections are for, as the speaker suggested earlier today, that when you disagree with someone's morals, where you disagree with their qualifications, or you disagree with their policies, this…

I think they should.

I think the bigger questions going to be how many Republicans they lose?

I think we laid out really clearly yesterday with the witnesses, talking about why we have an impeachment clause, why the Founders thought there were certain things that constituted impeachable conduct, and they were the very things we are…

He is soliciting interference from another country, and when he got caught out, he is trying to obstruct that investigation.