Does it make sense to change the regulations for an entire industry because of one incident, or is it smarter to make the enforcement and the penalty for not following the current regulations make more sense?
Critz questions whether regulations should change due to one incident or if enforcement should be stronger.
Share
More from Mark Critz
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum time for any electronic vote on the question of passage. The vote…
I would like to insert into the Record a letter from the United Steelworkers in opposition to the Korea free trade agreement. United Steelworkers, June 20, 2011. Re oppose the free trade agreements with Korea, Panama and Colombia U.S…
I appreciate the gentleman from Michigan for yielding, and I thank him for his leadership on this important issue. ``As the Chamber closest to the people, the House works best when it is allowed to work its will.'' Those aren't my words…
Not only does this reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources and decrease greenhouse gas emissions, but it also supports nearly 40,000 jobs.
Other voices in this conversation
