Transplants should be based, I believe, on the severity of the illness and not the person's age.

Why wouldn't we do it? Why, we do so much bull crap around this place and we have the chance to save someone's life.

I am begging you. Sarah has 3 to 5 weeks to live. Time is running out.

Would the NRC commit to paying for the cost difference if another Federal agency moved into 3?

I don't think the President's recommendation that we shrink the footprint... is a suggestion.

So I want to just close with this why, why did the NRC go around the committee authorization in 2007?

I think it has been very difficult when you are sitting next to agencies who believe what the President said, that we should find ways to move into smaller spaces.

But half of a building, you are willing to give up half of a building that you charged the taxpayers with $90 million to tailor-make it for you. What about that money? Can you imagine? Would you do that with your home?

I believe we have the right to know that.

Six years ago the NRC went around the committee authorization process and committed the taxpayers to $350 million for a building that you can't fill.

The new $1.2 million Coast Guard headquarters required 1.6 million cubic yards of excavation, 250,000 cubic yards of concrete.