On the recordJanuary 31, 1995
Would the law impute, in other words, based on the transactions the gentleman spoke of and the fact it was in his firm, would they automatically assume that the Secretary would have known?
Source
govinfo.govJon Fox: “Would the law impute, in other words, based on the transactions the gentleman spoke of and the fact it was in his firm…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the legal implications of knowledge in a specific case during a discussion.
Share
More from Jon Fox
Oct 1, 1998
The fact is that we would not be having this happy situation of a possible tax decrease if it were not for the fact that an historic balanced budget was adopted by the Republican-led Congress which has led to reduced costs for mortgage…
Oct 21, 1997
I think the gentleman hit some good points. The fact is that those two individuals, the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Armey], and the gentleman from Louisiana [Mr. Tauzin] are leading the fight for a flat tax and the sales tax, respectively…
Oct 9, 1998
I rise to support H.R. 2560. This is certainly legislation which is bipartisan. We thank the sponsor, the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr. Thompson), for introducing the bill, certainly congratulate him for his efforts in this regard and to…
Oct 21, 1997
Another interesting story, if the gentleman will continue to yield, I had a CPA from Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, call up the IRS helpful hotline, and he asked the question on behalf of his client. And they said, this is only for…
Other voices in this conversation
