Not only will it make sure that jobs are saved but they will not have needless lawsuits with the Federal Government to justify what they have been doing, which is correct to begin with under the original IRS examination; am I correct?
Discussing the implications of a proposal related to job preservation and IRS examinations.
Share
More from Jon Fox
The one I wanted to start off there was to talk about eliminating the marriage penalty. Right now, two people are discouraged from getting married because they actually will pay more in taxes if they do get married.
I like that idea of Carefree, Arizona. They probably do not pay taxes in Carefree.
I rise to support H.R. 2560. This is certainly legislation which is bipartisan. We thank the sponsor, the gentleman from Mississippi (Mr. Thompson), for introducing the bill, certainly congratulate him for his efforts in this regard and to…
Mr. Speaker, children are at the heart of the need for this legislation. No child should go to bed hungry, miss a medical appointment, not have adequate housing or be deprived of quality education. We have no more precious resource than…
Other voices in this conversation
