Mr. Chairman, does the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Peterson) really believe it is necessary for the taxpayers of the United States to socialize and/or subsidize our oil industry, which is immensely profitable, is price gouging, involved in supporting OPEC in their price fixing, that we need to give them taxpayer dollars to increase their production to go back to old reservoirs and get more production? Does the gentleman really believe that? I mean, does he really believe that they do not have an incentive from the marketplace to go and do this, we have to give them a taxpayer subsidy? This is taxpayer dollars. We are underfunding recreation which millions of Americans enjoy. Yes, we need to become energy independent. This is not about energy independence. It is about subsidizing a vastly profitable industry. How much is $50 million? Is it 1 minute or 2 minutes' profit for that industry?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the necessity of taxpayer subsidies for the oil industry during a debate.
Share
More from John W. Peterson
But if you want to make sure that the project costs three or four times what it should, then put the Corps of Engineers in charge, and you will accomplish it.
Well, it's a delight to join you. It's a historic day. Natural gas hit $13.28 a thousand cubic feet. That's almost double what it was last year at this time. What that means is Americans heating their 60 million homes this fall will pay…
We keep hearing from over there that it was all ethanol. Ethanol was just a piece. It was 15 percent. The rest was normal oil and gas energy. But they had a plan. I think we ought to have a plan for North America. Stop and think about…
I'm not opposed to CAFE. I'm not opposed to fuel efficiency. I'm not opposed to biofuels. But, folks, you are overselling them. We have an energy crisis today, not 5 years from now. OPEC told us last week no more oil, get used to $90 to…





