As a retailer all my life, that's what a gas company is. They're a retailer. I sold food. They sell gas. And as their business decreases, their profits go down, but their pipeline system, their pumping stations and all of their costs remain the same. My hesitation is with the cleanest energy we have, why do we want to restrict the use of it, because there's no NO<INF>X</INF>, no SO<INF>X</INF> and a third of the CO<INF>2</INF>. It seems like we ought to be more focused on making it affordable so that volumes remain constant and we don't have this problem. Again, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of energy policy on gas companies and the affordability of clean energy.
Share
More from John W. Peterson
Just yesterday, OPEC told the world that $90 oil is okay and they won't be increasing production. They want $100 oil. They want more. Now, on the surface, Americans will say, Thank God. We have a Democrat energy bill coming to help us as…
Folks, if we're serious about cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay, we can get affordable energy for America by producing offshore. Every country in the world produces here. We're the only country that doesn't, and we can have $20 billion, which…
Someone was talking the other day here on the floor that we're drilling twice as many wells and we don't need to drill more. Well, we're drilling in old, tired fields. We're drilling the cracks and crevices that we haven't drilled before…
If the Democrats win this debate and we don't produce energy--if we use these old statements of 68 million acres and 80 something percent is leased, that is not factual; 2.5 percent of the Outer Continental Shelf is leased, the good spots…





