Last week, we saw real signs of economic recovery when the unemployment rate dropped below 9 percent for the first time in 2 years. This is encouraging news, but we still have a long way to go to promote private sector growth. The Republicans are digging their heels in on billions of dollars of reckless cuts that threaten our economic growth and put 700,000 American jobs at risk. We agree that spending cuts are necessary to reduce the deficit. This is not about whether to cut or not. This is about where to cut, how much to cut, and how fast to cut. The Republican agenda threatens our core obligations to our seniors, to our safety, and to our future. We need disciplined budgeting. We need targeted cuts that won't hurt our economy. And we need strategic investments to make America competitive for future generations. Republicans are putting partisan politics ahead of American priorities. Instead of enacting job-destroying cuts, we should be focusing on job creation and sound budgeting. Enough is enough. It's time to get serious and pass a responsible spending plan that grows the economy and invests in the future.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses economic recovery and the impact of proposed spending cuts on jobs and growth.
Share
More from John Schwartz
I thank you, Mr. Minority Whip. You have spoken out every week both on the floor of Congress and around this country. You've spoken out on the actions we ought to be taking in order to strengthen our Nation, protect our seniors, grow our…
During rollcall vote No. 483 on H.R. 5856, I mistakenly recorded my vote as ``no'' when I should have voted ``aye.'' Amendment Offered by Ms. Woolsey The Acting CHAIR. The unfinished business is the demand for a recorded vote on the third…
To strengthen our economic competitiveness in a global economy, we must create the right environment for private sector growth in cutting-edge industries. As we work to reform our corporate Tax Code, it's critical that we consider policies…
On rollcall No. 305 had I been present, I would have voted ``yea.'' Stated against:





