one of the problems we have with this amendment is it should be in the authorization bill rather than our bill. But at any rate, it would really be very difficult for us to apply something like this. I understand what the gentlewoman is trying to do, but I would hope that the gentlewoman would withdraw this amendment and let us see what we can work out, because we have a lot of ``buy American'' provisions. This is kind of a new wrinkle to it. But we have an awful lot of operational problems that we might run into if we prohibited some of these things from being done. For instance, I remember the Roberts was first taken into a port in Dubai, I think it was, and then we finally shipped it back to the United States. But I think we need some more time to look at this. I appreciate your thoughts, and I know we will work with you trying to come up with something.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about an amendment related to operational issues and 'buy American' provisions.
Share
More from John Murtha
I think that is a perfect example of the way things work. When we see something that we think is not as valuable as something else is, we change it.
Absolutely. All the polls that I see, credibility has gone down to well below 50 percent. We have lost credibility in all the periphery. We've lost credibility in Europe. Everybody I talk to, every poll that I see shows the United States…
let me say to the Members what hurts our troops. I found our troops, 44,000, without body armor. I found our troops with a shortage of jammers. I found our troops with a shortage of up-armored Humvees. I find our troops now, because of the…
Let me mention to the gentleman, we have a $459 billion bill. We look at every one. We ask the Members to vet them. Our staff vets them. We go over every single earmark. We don't apologize for them because we think the Members know as much…





