This amendment takes care of a problem which for 2 years the Committee on Appropriations has worked out. There was a perception it saved a lot of money by changing the formula for retirement of the military. We find that it has not saved a lot of money. We are offering an amendment to rectify that problem.
John Murtha: “This amendment takes care of a problem which for 2 years the Committee on Appropriations has worked out. There was a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to military retirement funding during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Murtha
I don't represent Sherwin-Williams. I don't know what paint company you represent, but we know they are a very qualified contractor.
In this particular case we are looking for is sensors to protect against the type of thing that happened in Yemen with the USS Cole. We have a lot of people working on this, and we hope that we will be able to develop a system that will…
This is a very worthwhile project. Let me say to the gentleman, you see the number of hearings we have had, and the number of earmarks. Our staff went over every one of these earmarks very carefully. It's not on our highest priority list…
But I think in light of the recession and the economic difficulties we are facing it is not a good idea to pass legislation driving American industrial production back to the levels of 1920 at a time of potentially an economic depression.





