Could I ask the gentleman, and he may not be able to answer this question, but could we not have gone to conference since the other bill was reported out unanimously? I just wonder, is there some reason that we felt like we had to take up the Senate version of the bill? Were there enough changes in your estimation that it warranted taking up the Senate version amended?
John Murtha: “Could I ask the gentleman, and he may not be able to answer this question, but could we not have gone to conference…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the decision to take up the Senate version of a bill instead of going to conference.
Share
More from John Murtha
Let me just mention to the gentleman, 85 of the 90 members of the RSC receive, RSC which you just mentioned, receive earmarks in this total of this $436 million.
In this particular case we are looking for is sensors to protect against the type of thing that happened in Yemen with the USS Cole. We have a lot of people working on this, and we hope that we will be able to develop a system that will…
You can see the hearings we've had on this issue. We felt that the missile defense cuts we made were because of schedule more than anything else, and I appreciate your determination to put it in. We'll take another look at conference, but…
I don't represent Sherwin-Williams. I don't know what paint company you represent, but we know they are a very qualified contractor.





