when I went down to Austin after the election, but before the inauguration, I said to President Bush, President-elect Bush, we should worry more about terrorism and nuclear nonproliferation than worry about missile defense. But we worked out the best we can work out. I mean, we know they have not spent nearly the money they have, and I think the gentleman just stated that, I do not remember an exact amount, but I think it is only 1 or 2 percent of what we have already appropriated for nonproliferation. So I would appreciate it if the gentleman would consider letting us work on it and seeing what we can do. But we are just about to the point where I do not think we can put any more money in that they will spend. If it looks like we can work out a deal where they are going to spend more money, then it would be well worth considering what the gentleman has in mind. But, as it is, I feel the same way; but we tried to work out a balance where we knew we could get a bill signed, and I think we have come pretty well where it is. But I still think we would be quite willing to work with him.
Share
More from John Murtha
The policy, of course, comes from the White House. It doesn't come from the secretary of defense. So just changing the secretary of defense doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to get a change in direction.
Every one of these earmarks are competitively granted under the regulations of the Defense Department. We depend on them to competitively check them over, and they do.
Absolutely. All the polls that I see, credibility has gone down to well below 50 percent. We have lost credibility in all the periphery. We've lost credibility in Europe. Everybody I talk to, every poll that I see shows the United States…
I think the military leaders have lost complete confidence in this secretary. He didn't listen to people. He didn't ask for suggestions. He went to war when we didn't have a national security threat.





