So if you are taking 2.3 percent off their gross revenues, you are putting many of those companies at risk.
Editor's note · Context
Gerlach discusses the negative impact of the medical device tax on companies' profitability.
Share & report
More from Jim Gerlach
Wouldn't it make more sense, though, if a home health agency bills for, say, the $1,500, that the formula for reimbursement ought to be the lesser of what that episode of care was under the current formula or what is billed, whichever is…
the purpose of the corporate tax reform effort that you are going to be undertaking is to basically incentivize growing jobs and building jobs here in the United States.
I am really stunned, too, by the lack of responsiveness by CMS on this issue over the years.
Wouldn't it incentivize providing more care because you are going to get reimbursed more than what your actual, in essence, retail billing would be for that service?





