It is about children. That is why it is called the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act. In the history of medicine in America, we could never figure out a way to get the drug companies to do studies on children, delicate children, children who get sick from taking drugs. We could never find a way to get these studies done so we could bring the benefits of modern medicine that the elderly enjoy, that the middle-aged enjoy, fully to the children of America. In 1997, my Democratic proponent of this bill, the gentleman from California (Mr. Waxman) and I, wrote legislation that did that. We broke the impasse after all of those years, and we have just begun to reap the benefits from it. The Federal Food and Drug Administration said, 'The pediatric exclusivity provision has done more to generate clinical studies and useful prescribing information for the pediatric population than any other regulatory or legislative process to date,' period.
On the recordNovember 13, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act.
Share
More from James P. Greenwood
Feb 27, 2003
My point was that contrary to the argument that the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Smith) made that the purpose of this research is strictly for the exploitation and destruction of human life is wrong, this is about hope. This is about…
Dec 8, 2003
About 5 hours ago, I had what I consider to be one of the greatest moments of my 11-year congressional career as I got to watch the President of the United States sign into law a Medicare reform bill that will finally provide a…
Feb 11, 2016
I think that is precisely what needs to be done, and I have no doubt whatsoever that it will be successful in inspiring investment in this very dangerous field.





