I made a commitment to myself and my colleagues, an unusual one, and that is to come to this debate with my mind still available to persuasion. I am one of the last few holdouts undecided in this debate, and it needs to be said that not once, not once in this entire ordeal, has a single member of my leadership, has a single colleague, has a single member of the Committee on the Judiciary, not only not asked me to vote one way, they have never even inquired as to how I would vote. We have big differences of opinion here, but it does the process an injustice to argue that there has been arm twisting. I think the Whip has been maligned in this process. It has been alleged that he is twisting arms. I spent 3 rac{1}{2} hours in the company of the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Livingston), the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Armey), the gentleman from Texas (Mr. DeLay) and the entire elected leadership this week, and not once did any of them say a word to me about impeachment.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing claims of arm twisting during the impeachment debate.
Share
More from James P. Greenwood
My point was that contrary to the argument that the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Smith) made that the purpose of this research is strictly for the exploitation and destruction of human life is wrong, this is about hope. This is about…
I yield myself 10 seconds to note that the Stanford University professor who was just quoted, Steven Mosher, was kicked out of Stanford in the 1980s for academic fraud and misappropriation of university funds.
We are not organized as a Government to effectively and quickly respond to either pandemics or bioterror because the authorities are diffuse.
Reclaiming my time once again, I am not sure, with all due respect, that my friend from New Jersey understands this process. You cannot, you cannot, you cannot take one cloned entity and multiply it. You have to go back and get another…





