And since Americans are not used to buying drug- benefit insurance, this is a little alien to them. But if we think about buying automobile insurance, if we went to buy automobile insurance that would provide liability coverage for $10 million, that would be expensive. The premium that we would pay on a monthly basis or annual basis would be quite expensive to get that coverage. And if it were unlimited, if we had unlimited liability protection, of course it would be unaffordable and the insurance industry would have a hard time putting a price on that. That is almost the way it is with prescription drugs now, because we cannot predict the exposure with these new modern expensive drugs. So what we are saying here is, if it was automobile insurance and the Federal Government said we will cover everything over, let us say $50,000 of liability, then we know that the premium is going to go way down and we would have the coverage covered by the Federal Government. It is the same thing here. By the Federal Government, by our House Republican plan proposing to pay for that top, from the cap to the sky being the limit, suddenly now we have an affordable product that every American can afford to purchase.
On the recordMay 3, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the challenges of drug-benefit insurance and comparing it to automobile insurance.
Share
More from James P. Greenwood
Jun 4, 2003
Debates as the one we are having today always focus on the differences between us; and there are, in fact, differences between us. We who offer this substitute amendment believe that the 90 percent of abortions that occur in the first…
Mar 12, 2003
There is no one who is debating that there is a crisis in this country. The worst opponents, the most fervent of the opponents of the bill, the trial lawyers, are not arguing we are having a crisis in the States, including my State of…
Feb 11, 2016
it's clear and it's obvious that their intention is to kill as many infidels and apostates as they possible can.





