I am very conflicted by the vote on this rule. As has been referenced, I took to the Committee on Rules last night an amendment to amend the amendment of the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn) because I have a difference of opinion with him with regard to the policy. The Committee on Rules denied me the opportunity to bring my amendment to the floor this evening, and I do not like that. My normal inclination when the Committee on Rules denies me one of the few amendments that I take to the Committee on Rules is to oppose the rule. However, the gentleman from California (Mr. Campbell) has been made a promise, and that promise is that his bill would be debated on the floor. I think he deserves it. More importantly, there are thousands and thousands of physicians across this country who have felt frustrated by the present situation and whether we agree with their position or not, they went to the United States Congress, and they said, 'Please debate this issue.'
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the conflict over a rule regarding an amendment and the importance of debating a bill.
Share
More from James P. Greenwood
more than 200 years ago, the first President of the United States addressed the Nation's first Congress with these prophetic words, ``the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the Republican model of government are…
We cannot, we cannot get the reforms that are required to protect the investor in this country until we lance the boil. We have to pick the scab. We have to open the wound, look at it, allow it to be seen by the American people, to show…
This bill is on the floor for one reason and one reason alone. That reason is that across this country there is a crisis. The crisis is that the cost of medical malpractice insurance is so expensive that trauma centers have to close, that…





