I have to begin by saying that my heart is with, in many ways, the makers of this amendment. My heart is with the gentleman from Oklahoma and the gentleman from Illinois, because I understand what they want to do. They want to protect our children from the elements of our culture that would undermine the values that we try to teach them at home. They do not want a world in which our kids are sneaking behind our backs and getting information that rightly ought to come from us. As the gentlemen know, I have two daughters. They are 10 and 12. My wife and I are engaged in this struggle every single day. We are considered the fuddy-duds in our neighborhood, I think, because my daughters are always saying, how come everyone has their ears pierced already and we cannot? How come everybody can wear makeup to school and we cannot? How come you will not let MTV come into the house? I called the cable station and I do not let MTV come into the house. So that is pretty square, I guess.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing parental concerns about cultural influences on children.
Share
More from James P. Greenwood
I would be opposed to a penny of this money going to any program that did not preach and teach abstinence. It is absolutely necessary. My concern with the amendment is it would allow money to go to programs that do abstinence only. The…
more than 200 years ago, the first President of the United States addressed the Nation's first Congress with these prophetic words, ``the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the Republican model of government are…
I think that people need to understand that when one has given 24 years of one's life to public service, that doesn't mean that they owe the next 24 years of their lives.
We are underprepared to respond to these threats, and we must take immediate steps to be better prepared.





