I think it is constructive that earlier this afternoon the Pennsylvania delegation met with Governor Ridge, a former member here. The first question that our Governor asked is, When are you going to move this Ed-Flex bill? We absolutely have to have it. This is what he said was the primary reason, that 40 percent of the bureaucrats working in the State Department of Education are employed filling out Federal forms, only to qualify them for 7 percent of their total educational package. So the notion that the Castle amendment, joined in with the Ed-Flex bill, will give the Governor of Pennsylvania the opportunity to put some of those 40 percent of the educational bureaucrats to work doing something productive is reason enough for both the Castle amendment and the bill.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Ed-Flex bill and its implications for educational bureaucracy in Pennsylvania.
Share
More from James P. Greenwood
Today, we consider in the House under suspension H.R. 3580, a bill that I originally introduced with Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, but has become so much more. Thanks to a cooperative and bi-partisan approach, this bill has now become a…
Today, as the House considers the Foreign Operations Appropriations Act of 2005, I respectfully submit the following statement into the record in order to raise awareness of an issue that I have found most distressing. For over three…
This bill is on the floor for one reason and one reason alone. That reason is that across this country there is a crisis. The crisis is that the cost of medical malpractice insurance is so expensive that trauma centers have to close, that…
If they see a system that's uncertain due to lack of certainty that these products will be procured, they're going to put their money elsewhere.





