Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 24, 1998
I rise in support of H.R. 3605, the bipartisan Patients' Bill of Rights. Today we have a tremendous opportunity to protect our constituents' right to receive quality health care. More than half of all Americans are not offered a choice of health care providers by their employer. Under current law, many consumers have little recourse if their HMOs or insurance companies do not protect their most basic health care rights. I believe Congress must act to guarantee these rights. I am proud to be an original cosponsor of the bipartisan Ganske-Dingell bill (H.R. 3605). It would ban 'gag rules' and contracts in which doctors are paid less if they refer to needed specialists or suggest expensive treatment, guarantee access to specialty and emergency care, protected medical confidentiality, and give patients access to a free, timely appeals process if their HMOs deny them benefits. If patients are harmed by decisions made by their HMOs, they will be allowed to take the HMO to court and recover damages. H.R. 3605 also provides for speedy implementation. Americans need relief from badly managed care now, not 2 years from now. On the other hand, H.R. 4250, the Republican alternative, is a step in the wrong direction. It actually weakens the protections patients have under current law.
Said by
JAMES K. COYNE
Pennsylvania

Editor's note · Context

Supporting the bipartisan Patients' Bill of Rights during House floor debate.

Share

More from JAMES K. COYNE

Feb 10, 2000

marriage penalty relief is an important issue, and I am glad that the House is considering the legislation today. Most of us have supported marriage penalty relief for many, many years. That being said, however, I do not think that the…

govinfo.gov
Jun 17, 1998

too little is known about the effects that this legislation would have on the U.S. economy. This bill as amended would eliminate the Internal Revenue Code by December 31, 2002, except for Social Security, Medicare and Railroad Retirement…

govinfo.gov
May 22, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the motion before us would instruct the House conferees to insist on the provisions of the House bill on restructuring the Internal Revenue Service and thereby expedite IRS reform. Not to do so would only further delay…

govinfo.gov
Sep 19, 1996

I am opposed to H.R. 1833 because I oppose any legislation that fails to provide for the health concerns of the mother when she and her doctor believe that her health is in jeopardy. This legislation does not provide an exception for…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation