It simply renews the ongoing projects and appropriations and activities that are embodied in this bill. It just serves to continue them. It does not bring in new forms of spending or new programs, or in any way impinge upon the vitality of and the purpose of the instant bill. All it does, in its best sense, is on a day that the appropriations cycle has ended by reason of failure to enact a new budget, that those appropriations embodied in this bill simply continue in their life. Therefore, I ask that the Chair rule that this is simply a mechanism for continuing the efficacy and the vitality of the underlying bill, not new legislation on a new purpose or new project or new activity. Nothing of the sort.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nature of an amendment related to an appropriations bill.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
I support this measure because, parochially speaking, it does a great deal for some of the projects in which we are so interested in Pennsylvania. For instance, at Fort Indiantown Gap, this calls for full funding of an…
I rise to pose some reflections on the VFW. Many people will recall historically that during the Truman years there was an act of terrorism right in this Chamber, when terrorists of a different era shot up the entire Chamber here, wounding…
As everyone knows, the Judiciary has, for almost 2 years now, been working on the expected division of labor in the Immigration and Naturalization Service. On the one hand, we want to streamline the enforcement part of Immigration and…
The current bill contains a provision in which the result is a reallocation of certain funds that were appropriated for what is called Corridor One in central Pennsylvania, a very vital item in the revitalization of mass transit…





