That razor would be brought down on the neck of the $50,000 to $100,000 proposal that the gentleman and I are using as an example, and even under the main language of the bill, because if the verdict is $49,999, are we not making an arbitrary cut there as to who is----
Hon. George W. Gekas: “That razor would be brought down on the neck of the $50,000 to $100,000 proposal that the gentleman and I are using as…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
We are not adverse to developing a plan of tax incentives to give our fellow Americans, the entrepreneurs, the incentive to go ahead and drill where they might fail; but we ought to give them that incentive to do so and to otherwise bring…
The current bill contains a provision in which the result is a reallocation of certain funds that were appropriated for what is called Corridor One in central Pennsylvania, a very vital item in the revitalization of mass transit…
I want to substantiate my support for the amendment and to urge that everyone consider the question of unaccompanied young children and the provision of legal assistance in their quest to remain in the United States.
It is on the creditor, and that really conforms to the general state of the law in such cases. There has to be affirmative evidence of fraud having been committed so that the creditor must come forth.





