Does the gentleman consider a person who is waiting for a heart transplant a consumer that ought to be protected and should have the benefit of a heart transplant and should have laws in place that will facilitate the flow of materials to the medical device manufacturer, who will eventually be part of the heart transplant device? Does the gentleman favor legislation that would make it easier for a transplant recipient to receive that transplant?
Hon. George W. Gekas: “Does the gentleman consider a person who is waiting for a heart transplant a consumer that ought to be protected and…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the need for legislation to support heart transplant recipients.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
I want to substantiate my support for the amendment and to urge that everyone consider the question of unaccompanied young children and the provision of legal assistance in their quest to remain in the United States.
I have not been able to predict exactly what would happen. It seems to me that we ought to start a course on energy independence and go to it without respect to what OPEC does. All I am saying is we will have an extra dividend to lower…
The point is that transfers being a way of life, it is possible that the capital gains tax relief that is granted to people otherwise would not be granted to a member of the armed services because of the rapid transferability of every…
It is on the creditor, and that really conforms to the general state of the law in such cases. There has to be affirmative evidence of fraud having been committed so that the creditor must come forth.





